Blood Transfusions - How Safe?

This is a discussion on Blood Transfusions - How Safe? within the Reasons to Avoid Blood forum; Great article on blood safety. An opening tease is posted here click on the link ...


Notices

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes

Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2004, 02:46 PM
Jan B. Wade's Avatar
Healthcare Professional
 
Join Date: May 1996
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 22
Thanked 298 Times in 143 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
Blood Transfusions - How Safe?



Great article on blood safety. An opening tease is posted here click on the link to read and print the entire article.

http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb/article_02.htm

Blood Transfusions—How Safe?

Before submitting to any serious medical procedure, a thinking person will learn the possible benefits and the risks. What about blood transfusions? They are now a prime tool in medicine. Many physicians who are genuinely interested in their patients may have little hesitation about giving blood. It has been called the gift of life.

Millions have donated blood or have accepted it. For 1986-87 Canada had 1.3 million donors in a population of 25 million. "[In] the most recent year for which figures are available, between 12 million and 14 million units of blood were used in transfusions in the United States alone."—The New York Times, February 18, 1990.

"Blood has always enjoyed a 'magical' quality," notes Dr. Louise J. Keating. "For its first 46 years, the blood supply was perceived as being safer than it actually was by both physicians and the public." (Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, May 1989) What was the situation then, and what is it now?

Even 30 years ago, pathologists and blood-bank personnel were advised: "Blood is dynamite! It can do a great deal of good or a great deal of harm. The mortality from blood transfusion equals that from ether anesthesia or appendectomy. There is said to be approximately one death in 1,000 to 3,000 or possibly 5,000 transfusions. In the London area there has been reported one death for every 13,000 bottles of blood transfused."—New York State Journal of Medicine, January 15, 1960.

Have the dangers since been eliminated so that transfusions are now safe? Frankly, each year hundreds of thousands have adverse reactions to blood, and many die. In view of the preceding comments, what may come to your mind are blood-borne diseases. Before examining this aspect, consider some risks that are less well-known.

http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb/article_02.htm
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jan B. Wade For This Useful Post:
Bob Jordan (10-09-2009)
sponsor links


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007, 02:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
brian_121 is on a distinguished road
problem with Blood Transfusion

Wade, thank you for this wonderful article. and I really do appreciate what you just said. but is there any way we can avoid Blood Transfusion? Now imagine you or any nearest person of you just passed through an accident. and the doctor asked for blood in emergency. what would you do? will you wait for the system to check the donated blood before Transfusion? I think this problem will still remain until we find a way to create blood artificially.
__________________
What is fosamax
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 10:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
davidl7 is on a distinguished road
Quick questions: Can a blood transfusion be equated to eating blood? If blood is being used as blood, how can one say it the same as eating it? The blood is not being used as nourishment. Right? Any thoughts on how to reply to those questions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2009, 10:11 AM
Musatye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Musatye is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidl7 View Post
Quick questions: Can a blood transfusion be equated to eating blood? If blood is being used as blood, how can one say it the same as eating it? The blood is not being used as nourishment. Right? Any thoughts on how to reply to those questions?
Well, I´m not a native English spoken, but in the sense I understand 'nourishment', one of the prime functions of blood is to give nourishment to the cells.
As for the equalization of blood transfusion to eating blood...let´s make a little parallel. How do you usually nourish an unconsious patient, or one who can´t have oral feeding? By introducing nutrients in his bloodstream. This is one of the reasons why JW do not accept blood transfusions.

Hope this is of some help!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Musatye For This Useful Post:
LarryEitel (10-09-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2009, 08:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
davidl7 is on a distinguished road
Question

Thanks for your reply...True one of the main functions of blood is to transport nutrients throughout the body...and one can be transfused nutrients intravenously. However, blood by itself is not a nutrient. If blood is eaten or drank orally, it will get digested..but if transfused it is still blood, and being used as blood, not as a nutrient. So if blood is still blood, and being used as blood when transfused, how can it be compared to eating it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2009, 01:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 85
Thanks: 29
Thanked 86 Times in 43 Posts
anonymous2009 is on a distinguished road
If you're asking about Jehovah's Witnesses rufusal of blood it doesn't have to do with nourishment, that is not the reason Witnesses believe the Bible prohibits eating blood and commands to abstain from blood. However the tubefeeding illustration is used as well as an alcoholic would not be abstaining from alcohol if he didn't drink it but transfused it directly into his or her veins.

Hope this helps.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags
mortality, safety


sponsor links




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blood Transfusions - Safe Medicine? LarryEitel Medical Articles and Abstracts 7 11-03-2009 02:02 PM
Are Blood Transfusions Safe? Study says yes? Hmmm? Jonathan Steele Ask a Professional 1 07-30-2009 06:37 PM
“Safe Blood Donor Means Safe Patient” MD Reports on Mission to Afghanistan Sharon Grant News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 12-13-2008 04:19 PM
Are Blood Transfusions Safe? Study Links Blood Transfusions to Surgery Complications Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 12-04-2007 12:05 PM
Blood Supply: How Safe Is Safe Enough? Jan B. Wade Reasons to Avoid Blood 0 01-21-2004 02:55 PM