This is a discussion on Blood Transfusions - How Safe? within the Reasons to Avoid Blood forum; Great article on blood safety. An opening tease is posted here click on the link ...
|
||||
|
Blood Transfusions - How Safe?
Great article on blood safety. An opening tease is posted here click on the link to read and print the entire article.
http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb/article_02.htm Blood Transfusions—How Safe? Before submitting to any serious medical procedure, a thinking person will learn the possible benefits and the risks. What about blood transfusions? They are now a prime tool in medicine. Many physicians who are genuinely interested in their patients may have little hesitation about giving blood. It has been called the gift of life. Millions have donated blood or have accepted it. For 1986-87 Canada had 1.3 million donors in a population of 25 million. "[In] the most recent year for which figures are available, between 12 million and 14 million units of blood were used in transfusions in the United States alone."—The New York Times, February 18, 1990. "Blood has always enjoyed a 'magical' quality," notes Dr. Louise J. Keating. "For its first 46 years, the blood supply was perceived as being safer than it actually was by both physicians and the public." (Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, May 1989) What was the situation then, and what is it now? Even 30 years ago, pathologists and blood-bank personnel were advised: "Blood is dynamite! It can do a great deal of good or a great deal of harm. The mortality from blood transfusion equals that from ether anesthesia or appendectomy. There is said to be approximately one death in 1,000 to 3,000 or possibly 5,000 transfusions. In the London area there has been reported one death for every 13,000 bottles of blood transfused."—New York State Journal of Medicine, January 15, 1960. Have the dangers since been eliminated so that transfusions are now safe? Frankly, each year hundreds of thousands have adverse reactions to blood, and many die. In view of the preceding comments, what may come to your mind are blood-borne diseases. Before examining this aspect, consider some risks that are less well-known. http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb/article_02.htm
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade Blood Management Consultant Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost For Information Call - 360 296-1807
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jan B. Wade For This Useful Post: | ||
Bob Jordan (10-09-2009) | ||
| sponsor links |
|
|||
|
problem with Blood Transfusion
Wade, thank you for this wonderful article. and I really do appreciate what you just said. but is there any way we can avoid Blood Transfusion? Now imagine you or any nearest person of you just passed through an accident. and the doctor asked for blood in emergency. what would you do? will you wait for the system to check the donated blood before Transfusion? I think this problem will still remain until we find a way to create blood artificially.
__________________
What is fosamax |
|
|||
|
Quick questions: Can a blood transfusion be equated to eating blood? If blood is being used as blood, how can one say it the same as eating it? The blood is not being used as nourishment. Right? Any thoughts on how to reply to those questions?
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Musatye For This Useful Post: | ||
LarryEitel (10-09-2009) | ||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your reply...True one of the main functions of blood is to transport nutrients throughout the body...and one can be transfused nutrients intravenously. However, blood by itself is not a nutrient. If blood is eaten or drank orally, it will get digested..but if transfused it is still blood, and being used as blood, not as a nutrient. So if blood is still blood, and being used as blood when transfused, how can it be compared to eating it?
|
|
|||
|
If you're asking about Jehovah's Witnesses rufusal of blood it doesn't have to do with nourishment, that is not the reason Witnesses believe the Bible prohibits eating blood and commands to abstain from blood. However the tubefeeding illustration is used as well as an alcoholic would not be abstaining from alcohol if he didn't drink it but transfused it directly into his or her veins.
Hope this helps. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| mortality, safety |
| sponsor links |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Blood Transfusions - Safe Medicine? | LarryEitel | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 7 | 11-03-2009 02:02 PM |
| Are Blood Transfusions Safe? Study says yes? Hmmm? | Jonathan Steele | Ask a Professional | 1 | 07-30-2009 06:37 PM |
| “Safe Blood Donor Means Safe Patient” MD Reports on Mission to Afghanistan | Sharon Grant | News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS | 0 | 12-13-2008 04:19 PM |
| Are Blood Transfusions Safe? Study Links Blood Transfusions to Surgery Complications | Jan B. Wade | News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS | 0 | 12-04-2007 12:05 PM |
| Blood Supply: How Safe Is Safe Enough? | Jan B. Wade | Reasons to Avoid Blood | 0 | 01-21-2004 02:55 PM |