You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2006, 08:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 171
Thanks: 118
Thanked 42 Times in 27 Posts
jgrossberg is on a distinguished road
Egg on their Faces

In 1998, the Cochrane Injuries Group did a meta-analysis of 30 randomized, controlled trials investigating human albumin administration in critically ill patients. The results showed that, in patients receiving albumin, the risk of death was 14%; whereas the patients who did not receive albumin had a much lower risk of death, only 8%. The results were published and widely publicized worldwide on T.V. and in print. There was immediate negative response on the part of the drug regulatory agencies, the plasma products industry, and the medical profession. The plasma products industry tried vigorously to prevent a decline in albumin sales as a result of the information contained in the study. However, albumin use declined drastically after the Cochrane analysis was published. This article, published in 2002, describes the original trials and the Cochrane study findings, details surrounding the opposing reactions, and the final result supporting the conclusion of the authors, namely that evidence from systematic reviews such as the Cochrane study can have significant effect on clinical care. Click here for options for acquiring the original article by Ian Roberts and Francis Bunn, both affiliated with Cochrane Injuries Group.
__________________
Jan Grossberg, RN, BSN
Editorial Team
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Cross faces $5,000 fine in blood case lifeisbeautiful News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 05-30-2005 09:51 AM
Biopure faces Nasdaq delisting Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 12-21-2004 03:57 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.