Top court urged to strike down law that forced blood transfusion for teen

This is a discussion on Top court urged to strike down law that forced blood transfusion for teen within the News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS forum; Top court urged to strike down law that forced blood transfusion for teen 2 days ...


Notices

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes

Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2008, 08:59 AM
Jan B. Wade's Avatar
Healthcare Professional
 
Join Date: May 1996
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 22
Thanked 298 Times in 143 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
Top court urged to strike down law that forced blood transfusion for teen



Top court urged to strike down law that forced blood transfusion for teen

2 days ago


OTTAWA — A teenaged Jehovah's Witness who says she was traumatized by a blood transfusion that offended her religious principles wants the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn the legislation that forced her to undergo the procedure.

Lawyers for the teen told the court Tuesday that Manitoba child protection law is badly drafted and violates the guarantees of fundamental justice, equality before the law and religious freedom enshrined in the Charter of Rights.

The person at the heart of the case put things in more personal terms after the seven-judge panel had reserved their decision.

"What happened to me I wouldn't really like to happen to anyone else," she said outside the courtroom.

"It was painful - even physically it was painful - but mentally it was something that I believed shouldn't be happening."

Lawyers for the Manitoba government countered that there's nothing unconstitutional about the law, which allows for court-ordered treatment of minors in emergency situations.

"It could never, ever be in the best interests of a child that they make a decision that might cost them their life," Norm Cuddy, counsel for provincial Child and Family Services, told the court.

The saga began when the teenager, who can't be named and is identified for legal purposes only as A.C., went to a Winnipeg hospital in 2006 at age 14.

She was suffering from a flare-up of Crohn's disease, a chronic illness that can cause gastrointestinal bleeding. But in keeping with Jehovah's Witness teachings that forbid blood transfusions, she said she wanted to be treated without resorting to that procedure.

Child and Family Services went to court to obtain an order compelling her to have a transfusion after her doctor recommended that as the best course of treatment.

They acted under a provincial law that sets 16 as the cut-off age for medical decision-making. Counsel for A.C. say such choices should be made case-by-case, according to the intellectual capability of the person involved rather than by setting an arbitrary age.

There's no need to fear that more flexible rules would throw hospital emergency rooms into chaos, said lawyer David Day.

"The issue is not often going to arise," he told the court. "It will not be every person under 16 - it may be very few under the age of 16 - who can establish the competency to have their treatment choices respected."

That argument was seconded by Cheryl Milne, a lawyer for the group Justice for Children and Youth, who noted that Ontario already permits decisions on a case-by-case basis.

"The earth has not opened up in Ontario, the roof has not fallen down," said Milne. "It's a system that has worked and has protected the rights of children."

A.C., who now is nearly 17, moved with her family to Ontario after her 2006 difficulties in Winnipeg. She says her illness is under control and she hasn't been hospitalized again, but she remains faithful to her religious beliefs and is ready for any future crisis.

"If it came to the point where I'd die - which I certainly hope not, because I want to live as much as the next person - it's like a decision that I've made already."

Deborah Carlson, representing the Manitoba Attorney General's Department, argued that setting 16 as the age for medical decisions was a legitimate policy choice by the provincial legislature.

She denied the law is arbitrary, saying the wishes of "mature minors" under 16 are taken into account in each case. But the final decision is up to a judge who also weighs the need to protect the child's life.

"The legislation in Manitoba, taken as a whole, is in fact a sensible and balanced approach to very, very difficult issues," said Carlson. "The legislation should survive constitutional scrutiny."

The decision by the Supreme Court, which likely won't come for several months, could have repercussions in other provinces. Several use age 16 as a legal benchmark in their child protection laws, while Alberta sets the cut-off at 18 and British Columbia at 19.




Entire Article
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jan B. Wade For This Useful Post:
Bob Jordan (06-30-2009), CH Kraeft (11-07-2008), jmalak (07-01-2009), Richard Casas (07-07-2009)
sponsor links


  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2009, 03:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
jjwilliams73 is on a distinguished road
Result of case

Child's wishes count, court says
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jjwilliams73 For This Useful Post:
Richard Casas (07-07-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 69
Thanks: 16
Thanked 100 Times in 46 Posts
lekozza is on a distinguished road
(Video news report of above story)
1Cast

L.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lekozza For This Useful Post:
Bob Jordan (08-07-2009), Richard Casas (07-07-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-07-2009, 02:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 85
Thanks: 29
Thanked 86 Times in 43 Posts
anonymous2009 is on a distinguished road
Treatment decisions of mature teenagers “ought to be respected,” Supreme Court of Canada rules
OTTAWA, Canada—The Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision holding that once an adolescent under the age of 16 (in Mannitoba) proves he or she has sufficient maturity to make a particular medical treatment decision, the adolescent’s treatment decision “ought to be respected” by doctors and the state. That ruling was handed down on June 26, 2009.

Jehovah's Witnesses: Office of Public Information Authorized Site

(includes link to official court decision)

There have been various minors in Canada over the years as young as 12 that are Witnesses that have been ruled mature minors even under the laws that Mannitoba already had such as age descrimination, religious rights and taking minor's views and needs into consideration. But this new law will make sure it will happen since mature minors havn't been given much consideration there lately like AC. There are other provinces that already have laws similiar to the one that the Court passed down in Mannitoba. The previous judges also took into consideration how a forced blood transfusion would affect the minor emotionally and actually listened to how they felt instead of having court hearings without the children even being there which is not the way they are supposed to do it but have been.

The Canadian Child Welfare agencies even wanted to seperated 12 and 14 year olds from their parents and regularly force blood on them even when the mortality rate was 70% anyway or would only give an extra two years one doctor even said he wouldn't have done if the judge had ordered him to) Some the kids impressed some of the doctors.

And you know you don't need as much maturity for some things as you do for others. You don't need as much maturity to seek out alternatives as you would for refusing blood entirely. The ECHR charter says that regarding medical treatment the opinion of the minor shall be taken into consideration as an INCREASINGLY determining factor according to both age and level of maturity. I'm not sure how many European countries signed the charter.

I hope Mannitoba does it the same because they could the way it is worded about sufficient maturity. It would solve some of the problems Canada has had and would put less pressure on the kids as well as avoid the frustruation they kids have had to deal with.

But it seems some provinces are having issues even letting minors seek out alternatives which actually violates the parent's rights according to previous rulings in the Supreme court about non blood medical management. The guidelines therein have been followed by some judges but not by others.

Last edited by anonymous2009; 08-07-2009 at 02:56 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to anonymous2009 For This Useful Post:
Bob Jordan (08-07-2009), LarryEitel (08-07-2009), leanbanana (02-26-2010)
Reply
Tags
personal choice, supreme court


sponsor links




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Irish Court ordered adult Witness patient to receive a blood transfusion. rjbsec News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 1 09-25-2006 03:19 PM
Scotland - Court bid for blood transfusion Hepatitis inquiry Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 05-10-2005 04:11 PM
Teen can't refuse blood, court rules Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 04-18-2005 06:23 PM
B.C. girl must have a blood transfusion: court Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 04-13-2005 07:48 AM
Court reinstates suit over blood transfusion LarryEitel News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 1 10-26-2003 11:10 AM