You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > General > News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2007, 04:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 52 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Stronger Warnings on 3 Drugs for Anemia

"The main factor expected to depress sales of the drugs in the coming year is a new reimbursement policy by Medicare. Amgen said yesterday that it would formally ask the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or C.M.S., to overturn that policy.

Medicare’s new policy applies to patients with anemia caused by chemotherapy. Medicare cuts off reimbursement for the drugs once a patient’s hemoglobin — the component of red blood cells that carries oxygen — rises above 10 grams for each deciliter of blood."


November 9, 2007
Stronger Warnings on 3 Drugs for Anemia

By ANDREW POLLACK


Amgen and Johnson & Johnson strengthened the label warnings for their widely used anemia drugs yesterday, placing further emphasis on the risk that the medicines could cause heart attacks, a worsening of cancer and death.

The changes, made in consultation with the Food and Drug Administration, come after a year in which accumulating data have suggested that the drugs — Amgen’s Epogen and Aranesp, and Johnson & Johnson’s Procrit — can be dangerous if overused.

The new warnings also state for the first time that the drugs’ risks for cancer patients cannot be excluded even at doses previously considered safe and routinely used.

The warnings could contribute to a decline in use of the drugs that is already well under way. But analysts said in general that the new labeling was not as restrictive as it could have been.

James F. Reddoch, an analyst at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey, called the label changes “not bad,” and said in a note to clients that it was now less likely that insurance companies would further restrict reimbursement for the drugs.

Amgen’s shares fell 17 cents yesterday to $56.03, while Johnson & Johnson’s rose 68 cents to $64.59.

The drugs are used by about one million Americans a year, mostly people with anemia caused by cancer chemotherapy or kidney failure. Combined sales worldwide were nearly $10 billion last year.

The main factor expected to depress sales of the drugs in the coming year is a new reimbursement policy by Medicare. Amgen said yesterday that it would formally ask the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or C.M.S., to overturn that policy.

Medicare’s new policy applies to patients with anemia caused by chemotherapy. Medicare cuts off reimbursement for the drugs once a patient’s hemoglobin — the component of red blood cells that carries oxygen — rises above 10 grams for each deciliter of blood.

Amgen said the new labels on the drugs support its cause. For cancer patients, the label calls for using the lowest possible dose that allows a patient to avoid blood transfusions, with hemoglobin levels not to exceed 12 grams for each deciliter.

“The label gives physicians discretion between 10 and 12,” Kevin W. Sharer, Amgen’s chief executive, told securities analysts yesterday. “That’s the main point. And the C.M.S. decision does not.”

But F.D.A. officials said that the Medicare decision was consistent with the new label.

“This is not a target,” Dr. Richard Pazdur, the director of the agency’s cancer drug office, said about the hemoglobin level of 12. “This is an upper boundary for safety concerns.”

Medicare has said that it cannot overturn its decision without new evidence. Amgen said it would present some new evidence, including information showing that more cancer patients are now needing blood transfusions. But some analysts were skeptical that the company would succeed in overturning Medicare’s decision.

The new labels came after the F.D.A. held two advisory committee meetings to consider the safety of the drugs. The agency had first slapped a so-called black box warning, the toughest kind, on the drugs in March as an interim measure.

For patients with kidney failure, the label calls for hemoglobin levels to be maintained at between 10 and 12. That is perhaps a bit less restrictive than the label in March.

But new wording in the label calls for doctors to exercise restraint or possibly discontinue use for patients who do not reach the desired hemoglobin levels after 12 weeks of treatment.

Until now, dialysis centers have tended to give such patients astronomical doses in an effort to raise their hemoglobin levels.

Joel Sendek said in a note to clients that the new label would reduce sales by “eliminating the exorbitant doses given to those patients who have historically been a major source of revenue for Amgen” and for dialysis centers.


Read Entire Article Here
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > General > News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amgen, J&J Anemia Drugs Limited by California Insurer (Update3) Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 07-17-2007 09:53 AM
Analysis: New warnings on anemia drugs Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 3 03-12-2007 09:23 AM
Studies Show Anemia Drugs May Harm Cancer Patients Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 03-01-2007 09:44 AM
Rivals Laying Siege to Amgen's Near Monopoly in Anemia Drugs Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 12-26-2005 06:05 AM
Drugs ease anemia in kidney disease Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 11-19-2003 08:27 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:34 AM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.