You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > General > News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2004, 09:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 7
Thanked 115 Times in 67 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
Heart Bypass Surgery Method Assessed Beating Heart Results in More Failed Grafts

Heart Bypass Surgery Method Assessed
Study: Coronary Bypass Surgery on a Beating Heart Results in More Failed Grafts Within Months

The Associated Press


Dec. 31 — Doing bypass surgery on a beating heart instead of using a heart-lung machine is far more likely to result in clogging of the new arteries within just a few months, a study found.

Three months after so-called off-pump surgery, 12 percent of the grafted blood vessels were blocked, compared with 2 percent in patients whose hearts were stopped while they were hooked up to a heart-lung machine. A few earlier studies found no difference in blockages.

"We were quite surprised that there was a difference," said Dr. Natasha E. Khan, who directed the study at London's Royal Brompton Hospital. "It inserts a little caution into how quickly this technique should be expanded into our everyday practice."

Overall, the study found that off-pump surgery appears to be as safe as conventional bypass with a heart-lung machine. The major difference was how quickly the grafts became clogged.

Khan said researchers do not know the reason for the difference. Possibilities include the different doses of blood thinners used, the difficulty of the surgery, or that many of the 103 patients had a previous heart attack or diabetes.

"I think it's going to be very difficult in a small population like this to try to put your finger on what exactly it was that caused the difference," she said.

Khan said off-pump surgery has not been done long enough or studied in large enough numbers yet to conclude whether it is better or worse, and it could be a decade before the verdict is in.

The study is in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

In bypass surgery, a heart-lung machine circulates the patient's blood while surgeons attach new blood vessels to create a detour around clogged arteries.

But the machine is thought to increase the risk of stroke, bleeding, damage to the heart and kidneys and possibly mental decline, because it can dislodge bits of plaque into the blood or cause tiny clots or air bubbles.

To avoid those complications, some surgeons have been doing more challenging off-pump surgery, operating on a slippery, beating heart. Devices that help hold the heart still were developed in the mid-1990s, and now about 9 percent of bypass operations are done without the heart-lung machine.

About 314,000 people nationwide had bypasses done in 2000.

In previous studies, off-pump surgery decreased kidney and heart damage, reduced hospital stays and slightly lowered costs. Research is less clear on whether it prevents the memory loss or mental decline that some bypass patients experience.

The latest study also looked at how well the grafts held up three months after surgery in a group of patients who needed at least three grafts. Most earlier studies had fewer grafts.

In the off-pump group, 114 of 130 grafts, or 88 percent, were still working, compared with 127 of 130 grafts, or 98 percent, in the heart-lung machine group.

There was less heart damage in the off-pump group and hospital stays were the same for both groups. There were no deaths; one patient in the off-pump group had a heart attack afterward. The researchers tested mental function but have not yet published the results, which Khan said will be of limited value because of the small number of participants.

The researchers said off-pump surgery may be appropriate for patients who are at high risk of complications from the bypass machine.

Dr. Gus J. Vlahakes, a cardiac surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital, said off-pump surgery is reserved there for high-risk patients, such as those with lung or kidney disease or diseased aortas.

"Bypasses don't stay open forever, and there is a small percentage that close early. But in the time frame that they had, that was a significant percentage of graft closure," he said.

Dr. Sidney Smith, a professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina and a past president of the American Heart Association, said a key question is whether more grafts will stay open as doctors gain experience with the off-pump technique. The researchers noted it may take longer to learn the procedure than they anticipated.

"It's a very helpful study giving us important information about a new strategy," Smith said. "I think this is a technology that is worth pursuing."
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > General > News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Usefulness of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for pediatric open-heart Nika Medical Articles and Abstracts 1 06-11-2008 02:56 AM
Udupi: Beating Heart Surgery performed at KMC Abishai News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 06-25-2007 05:31 AM
ISMICS Publishes Consensus Statement on Beating Heart Bypass Surgery in INNOVATIONS Sharon Grant News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 1 12-02-2005 06:13 PM
Infant heart lung bypass machine wombat Ask a Professional 6 12-22-2004 03:12 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:12 PM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.