You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2007, 10:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 7
Thanked 115 Times in 67 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac

Link

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically evident congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who are receiving hemodialysis, administration of epoetin to raise their hematocrit to 42 percent is not recommended.

N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 27;339(9):584-90.



The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin.


Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, USA.
BACKGROUND: In patients with end-stage renal disease, anemia develops as a result of erythropoietin deficiency, and recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is prescribed to correct the anemia partially. We examined the risks and benefits of normalizing the hematocrit in patients with cardiac disease who were undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: We studied 1233 patients with clinical evidence of congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who were undergoing hemodialysis: 618 patients were assigned to receive increasing doses of epoetin to achieve and maintain a hematocrit of 42 percent, and 615 were assigned to receive doses of epoetin sufficient to maintain a hematocrit of 30 percent throughout the study. The median duration of treatment was 14 months. The primary end point was the length of time to death or a first nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: After 29 months, there were 183 deaths and 19 first nonfatal myocardial infarctions among the patients in the normal-hematocrit group and 150 deaths and 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions among those in the low-hematocrit group (risk ratio for the normal-hematocrit group as compared with the low-hematocrit group, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.9). Although the difference in event-free survival between the two groups did not reach the prespecified statistical stopping boundary, the study was halted. The causes of death in the two groups were similar. The mortality rates decreased with increasing hematocrit values in both groups. The patients in the normal-hematocrit group had a decline in the adequacy of dialysis and received intravenous iron dextran more often than those in the low-hematocrit group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically evident congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who are receiving hemodialysis, administration of epoetin to raise their hematocrit to 42 percent is not recommended.


__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bloodless Cardiac Surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses: Outcomes Compared Celador Press Releases 1 02-03-2008 10:00 AM
Bloodless Cardiac Surgery in Jehovah's Witnesses: Outcomes Compared With a Control Gr Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 08-03-2007 06:41 AM
The use of erythropoietin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: effects . . . Sharon Grant Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 01-27-2007 09:07 PM
The use of erythropoietin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: effects on he Sharon Grant Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 11-17-2006 05:52 PM
Results- Perfusion.com Cardiac Hematocrit Trend Survey:Observations/Recommendations Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 01-17-2006 03:59 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 PM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.