You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2006, 08:26 PM
Sharon Grant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 426
Thanks: 50
Thanked 120 Times in 59 Posts
Sharon Grant is on a distinguished road
Intraoperative Blood Salvage in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: a Randomised, Controlle

World J Surg. 2006 Apr 20; [Epub ahead of print]

Intraoperative Blood Salvage in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: a Randomised, Controlled Trial.

Bowley DM, Barker P, Boffard KD.

Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Blood is a scarce and costly resource. Transfusion is often required after major trauma but blood may not be readily available, and concerns remain over the potential adverse consequences of allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) is used extensively after blunt abdominal trauma, but when blood is contaminated by enteric contents its use has been considered contraindicated. METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled trial conducted with Ethical Review Board approval in an inner city trauma unit. Patients with penetrating torso injury requiring a laparotomy and who had exhibited hypotension either pre-hospital or on arrival and in whom there was considered to be significant blood loss were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The control group was given allogeneic blood transfusion at the discretion of the attending medical staff. The cell save (CS) group underwent IBS with transfusion of both allogeneic and autologous blood. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. The primary outcome was exposure to allogeneic blood up to the first 24 hours postinjury. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into the control group and 21 into the CS group. The groups were equivalent in demographic details, injury patterns and injury severity. The mean volume of salvaged blood re-infused in the CS group was 1,493 ml (range 0-2,690 ml). The mean number of units of allogeneic blood transfused in the first 24 hours in the control group was 11.17 compared to 6.47 in the CS group (P = 0.008). Enteric injury had been sustained in 17/23 (75%) of the control group and 18/21 (85%) of the CS group (P = NS). Survival in the control group was 8/23 (35%) compared to 7/21 (33.3%) in the CS arm (P = NS). Patients with documented postoperative sepsis were significantly more likely to die compared to those without sepsis (P = 0.04); however, those patients in the CS arm were no more likely to develop sepsis compared to those who received allogeneic blood alone. CONCLUSION: In this randomised, controlled trial for patients with penetrating abdominal injuries, IBS led to a significant reduction in allogeneic blood usage with no discernable effect on rates of postoperative infection or mortality.

Entrez PubMed
__________________
Sharon Grant
Editorial Team
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intraoperative Red Blood-Cell Salvage in Revision Hip Surgery Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 02-01-2007 09:54 PM
Intraoperative Blood Salvage LarryEitel Tools & Products 0 10-20-2006 01:34 PM
Intraoperative blood salvage: fluid replacement calculations Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 11-05-2005 03:07 AM
Intraoperative blood salvage: fluid replacement calculations Nika Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 03-18-2005 12:30 AM
Intraoperative Blood Salvage: (Cell Saver) Editors Glossary of Terms 0 11-29-2003 02:16 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:03 PM.






! ! ! NEW ! ! !
NoBlood Mobile
NoBlood Mobile
beta

Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Hospitals
Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Hospitals

Featured
Hospital Sponsors

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.