This is a discussion on Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to within the Medical Articles and Abstracts forum; Transfusion. 2006 Jul;46(7):1120-9 Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to stratify ...
|
||||
|
Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to
Transfusion. 2006 Jul;46(7):1120-9
Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to stratify cardiac surgery patients according to their blood transfusion needs.Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. abdullah.alghamdi@utoronto.ca BACKGROUND: Allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with transfusion reactions, infection transmission, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to develop and validate an accurate and simple clinical index to stratify cardiac surgery patients according to their blood transfusion needs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at Toronto General Hospital (n = 11,113) and Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Center (n = 5316) between May 1999 and June 2004 were collected for the development, validation, and external validation of the index. Primary outcome was the exposure to blood transfusion in the operative and first postoperative days. Multivariable logistic regression modeling techniques were used to determine the relationship between each independent variable and the exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion. Score assignment for each predictor variable was based on its regression coefficient. The predicted probabilities at each total score were compared to the observed proportions of patients exposed to blood transfusion. The clinical tool consists of eight preoperative variables: preoperative hemoglobin, weight, female sex, age, nonelective procedure, preoperative creatinine, previous cardiac surgical procedure, and nonisolated procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the standards of measurement in clinical research, a valid clinical tool was developed for predicting the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The clinical tool was internally and externally validated, and the results suggest that it should perform well at other institutions. Entrez PubMed
__________________
Sharon Grant Editorial Team |
![]() |
| Tags |
| infection, scoring, transfusion |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Understanding the consequences of transfusion-related acute lung injury | Sharon Grant | Reasons to Avoid Blood | 14 | 04-11-2008 10:16 PM |
| Blood transfusions are associated with increased risk for development of sepsis... | Sharon Grant | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 01-07-2007 05:58 PM |
| Development and validation of a mathematical algorithm for quantifying preoperative b | Jan B. Wade | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 04-16-2005 01:08 PM |
| Toward an understanding of transfusion-related acute lung injury: statement of a cons | Nika | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 04-10-2005 11:56 PM |
| Validation of a transfusion prediction model in head and neck cancer surgery | Jan B. Wade | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 02-06-2004 12:09 PM |