You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2006, 09:00 PM
PeterHofland's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
PeterHofland is on a distinguished road
Comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high-transfusion-risk cardiac surgery

A propensity score case-control comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high-transfusion-risk cardiac surgery.

Karkouti K, Beattie WS, Dattilo KM, McCluskey SA, Ghannam M, Hamdy A, Wijeysundera DN, Fedorko L, Yau TM.

Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. keyvan.karkouti@uhn.on.ca

Published in: Transfusion. 2006 Mar;46(3):327-38.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass may result in excessive fibrinolysis and platelet (PLT) dysfunction, resulting in impaired hemostasis and excessive blood loss. Prophylactic use of the antifibrinolytic drugs aprotinin and tranexamic acid is thought to prevent these hemostatic defects. Their relative clinical utility and safety in high-transfusion-risk cardiac surgery, however, is not known.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:
Using propensity scores, 449 patients who received aprotinin for high-transfusion-risk cardiac surgery were matched to 449 patients who received tranexamic acid from a pool of 10,870 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery at a single center, 586 of whom received aprotinin and the remainder of whom received tranexamic acid.
RESULTS:
The two matched groups were well balanced in terms of measured perioperative variables. Blood product transfusion rates were similar in the aprotinin and tranexamic acid groups: red blood cells, 79 percent versus 76 percent (p = 0.3); PLTs, 56 percent versus 50 percent (p = 0.06); and plasma, 66 percent versus 61 percent (p = 0.1). Adverse events rates were comparable in the two groups, except for renal dysfunction (defined as a greater than 50% increase in creatinine concentration during the first postoperative week to >100 micromol/L in women and >110 micromol/L in men or a new requirement for dialysis support), which occurred in 24 percent (107/449) of aprotinin patients and 17 percent (75/449) of tranexamic acid patients (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS:
Aprotinin and tranexamic acid have similar hemostatic effectiveness in high-transfusion-risk cardiac surgery. Within the confines of propensity score matching, our results suggest that aprotinin may be associated with renal dysfunction.

PMID: 16533273 [PubMed - in process]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison of the effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on blood loss and red bloo Sharon Grant Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 10-20-2006 08:33 PM
A propensity score case-control comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in high- Sharon Grant Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 10-07-2006 08:55 PM
Does salvage and tranexamic acid reduce the need for blood transfusion in revision hi Sharon Grant Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 09-23-2006 09:19 PM
NEJM - The Risk Associated with Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 01-25-2006 03:35 PM
Use of intravenous tranexamic acid to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion total joint Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 12-24-2003 09:32 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 AM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.