This is a discussion on Randomized trial of normal saline solution injection versus bipolar electrocoagulatio within the Medical Articles and Abstracts forum; Source: Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jan;55(1):6-10. Full Text Article Link (Subscription Required): http://www2.us.elsevierhealth.com/sc...34079&nav=full Randomized trial of ...
|
||||
|
Randomized trial of normal saline solution injection versus bipolar electrocoagulatio
Source:
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jan;55(1):6-10. Full Text Article Link (Subscription Required): http://www2.us.elsevierhealth.com/sc...34079&nav=full Randomized trial of normal saline solution injection versus bipolar electrocoagulation for treatment of patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers: is local tamponade enough? Laine L, Estrada R. Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, USC School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA. BACKGROUND: Endoscopic injection of normal saline solution is reportedly an effective treatment for bleeding ulcers. If it is as effective as standard therapy, low cost, wide availability, and lack of injury would make saline solution injection an attractive option. METHODS: Patients with clinical evidence of major bleeding from an ulcer with active bleeding or a nonbleeding visible vessel were randomly assigned to injection with normal saline solution (1-2 mL boluses; mean volume 30 mL) or bipolar electrocoagulation (20 W, 10-sec applications; mean time 100 sec). Patients, those caring for patients, and those collecting data were blinded to therapy. RESULTS: Further bleeding occurred in 14 (29%) of 48 patients in the saline solution group versus 6 (12%) of 52 patients in the bipolar group (95% CI [2%, 33%]; p = 0.04). Significantly more units of blood were transfused in the saline solution group (median 2 units vs. 0 units; p = 0.01). Hospital days (median 4 vs. 3) and mortality (6% vs. 2%) were not significantly different in the 2 groups. Independent risk factors for further bleeding were saline solution injection (p = 0.02), units transfused before therapy (p = 0.02), and ulcer size (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Local tamponade with saline solution injection is less effective than bipolar electrocoagulation for the treatment of bleeding ulcers. Publication Types:
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bipolar, electrocoagulatio |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of adding vitamin B12 and folate to ery | Sharon Grant | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 10-20-2006 10:08 PM |
| A prospective randomized trial toward a "blood transfusion"-free hepatectomy. | PeterHofland | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 03-26-2006 08:01 AM |
| Prediction of therapeutic failure after adrenaline injection plus heater probe treatm | Nika | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 05-08-2005 07:19 PM |
| A randomized trial of aprotinin (Trasylol) on blood loss, blood product requirement.. | Jan B. Wade | Medical Articles and Abstracts | 0 | 12-24-2003 10:38 AM |
| Normal Saline | Editors | Glossary of Terms | 0 | 11-29-2003 03:24 PM |