Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Welcome to NoBlood.
You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.
|

05-08-2005, 06:24 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 199
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
|
Argon beam coagulation for post-tonsillectomy hemostasis.
Source:
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Mar;126(3):316-20.
Full Text Article (Subscription):
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retri...94599802046946
Argon beam coagulation for post-tonsillectomy hemostasis.
Bowling DM.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Otolaryngology, and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02180, USA. dbowling@massmed.org
OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of argon beam coagulation (ABC) in the prevention of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage. ABC provides monopolar coagulation by arcing ionized argon gas to the target tissue; it is not a laser. METHODS: Two consecutive studies were performed as follows. In the first, a retrospective analysis of post-tonsillectomy bleeding in 344 patients was conducted. Final tonsil fossa hemostasis was achieved with ABC (257 patients) or with electrocoagulation (EC) (87 patients). In the second, a prospective, randomized, patient-blind study of post-tonsillectomy bleeding was conducted in 88 patients. Final hemostasis was achieved using ABC in one fossa and EC in the other fossa, with the sides chosen at random. RESULTS: Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage was defined as the expectoration of fresh blood, as opposed to blood-streaked saliva. The rates of bleeding for the 2 studies were as follows. In study 1 for EC, 20% for adults, 6.5% for children, and 10.3% for total; for ABC, 4.7% for adults, 0.6% for children, and 1.9% for total. In study 2 for EC, 19.2% for adults, 1.6% for children, and 6.8% for total; for ABC, 7.7% for adults, 0.0% for children, and 1.1% for total. The rates of hospital admission for observation or reoperation to treat the bleeding in study 1 for EC were 8% for adults, 6.5% for children, and 6.9% for total; for ABC, 1.2% for adults, 0.6% for children, and 0.7% for total. Corresponding rates for study 2 for EC were 15.4% for adults, 1.6% for children, and 5.7% for total; for ABC, 3.8% for adults, 0.0% for children, and 1.1% for total. CONCLUSION: ABC is more effective than EC for hemostasis after tonsillectomy. The costs of ABC use vs the savings achieved from reduced bleeding are discussed.
Publication Types: - Clinical Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 11956541 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 PM.
|
Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and
awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.
|
| Highlights |
|
Looking for help?
|
|
Can you help?
|
|