You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2005, 09:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,438
Thanks: 8
Thanked 121 Times in 71 Posts
Jan B. Wade is on a distinguished road
Blood Collection and Transfusion in the United States in 1999

Blood Collection and Transfusion in the United States in 1999

Article

Blood Collection and Transfusion in the United States in 1999
Friday, February 4th, 2005
Author: SABM Staff

Blood Collection and Transfusion in the United States in 1999

In the February issue of Transfusion, Marian T. Sullivan and Edward L. Wallace report the results of Nationwide Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS), a survey of blood services activities in the US conducted in 2000 by the National Blood Data Resource Center. The survey and analytic methods were designed to provide national estimates for key blood services activities in 1999 and to allow for comparison with previous measurements, the authors explain. Such information provides a better understanding of the trends over time in blood donation, processing, and utilization and informs resource planning and policy-making decisions.

A single survey instrument consisting of five sections and 54 questions was sent to three types of establishments: regional blood centers, transfusing hospitals, and other specialty facilities. The survey sample was based on the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) institutional membership list and the American Hospital Association (AHA) list of US hospitals. The final sample included 145 blood centers and 1583 hospitals from the AABB membership list and 3488 hospitals that provided general medical and surgical services or children's medical and surgical services and were not known as members of AABB.

Response rates differed among the institutional types and surgical volume categories and ranged from 98.6% for blood centers to 62.1% for the lowest surgical volume class of non-AABB hospitals. Among the non-AABB hospitals, the response rates were 70.3%, 64.5%, and 62.7%, respectively, for the three highest surgical volume classes, which were the predominant users of blood and blood components. Statistical procedures were used to verify the representativeness of the sample and to estimate national totals.

In 1999, the authors report, the total US blood supply was 13,876,000 units, of which blood centers collected or imported 12,851,000 units (92.6%) and hospitals 1,025,000 units (7.4%), an increase of 10.1 percent over 1997. A total of 12,389,000 red blood cell (RBC) units were transfused, namely 90.8% of the available supply, consisting of 11,804,000 allogeneic units (95.3%), 367,000 autologous units (3%), and 103,000 directed units (0.8%). Approximately 1,260,000 units, i.e. 9.2% of the available supply, were not transfused. Of the 651,000 autologous units collected, 284,000 (43.6%) were discarded.

An estimated 4.5 million recipients were transfused with whole blood and/or RBCs, 3.8 million of whom received allogeneic units. Allogeneic blood recipients were reported to have received a mean of 2.8 units per transfusion episode. Of 1709 responding hospitals, 112 hospitals (6.6%) reported cancellations of elective surgeries on one or more days during 1999 because of blood shortages. The median number of days of cancellations among these 112 hospitals was 2 (range, 1-150).

With regard to non-RBC components, 1,203,000 units of platelets (PLT) from pheresis, 4,693,000 PLT concentrate units, 3,810,000 fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and single-donor plasma units, and 1,972,000 units of cryoprecipitate were produced. A total of 1,003,000 units of single-donor PLTs (an increase of 6.7% over 1997) and 3,036,000 units of PLT concentrate (a decrease of 10.6% from 1997) were administered. Transfusions of FFP and single-donor plasma units amounted to 3,319,000 units, virtually the same number as transfused in 1997. As a consequence, the marked increase of 15.1% in FFP and single-donor plasma unit collections in 1999 resulted in the waste of 491,000 units. Cryoprecipitate transfusions amounted to 860,000 units, a 5.4% increase over 1997.

As the authors point out, the 2000 NBCUS reveals that a number of important changes occurred in the US between 1997 and 1999. These changes, the authors state, include a significant increase in allogeneic blood collections, a significant increase in whole blood and/or RBC transfusions, a substantial increase in prestorage leukoreduction of blood components, a leveling of the rate of laboratory testing losses, and continuation of the trend toward greater utilization of single-donor apheresis PLTs.

Between 1994 and 1999, RBC transfusions increased by 1,282,000 units (11.5%), due primarily to greater transplantation demands and an aging population. “Given an ever-growing demand driven by greater transplantation and oncologic needs, coupled with an aging pool of US donors and the likelihood of new deferral criteria, blood collecting establishments face a major challenge in the future to maintain an adequate margin of available supply over increasing demand,” the authors note.
__________________
Mr. Jan B. Wade
Blood Management Consultant
Enhance Outcomes - Control Cost
For Information Call - 360 296-1807
Email

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cost of unit of red cells in the United States Susan Gagne The Book Room 10 09-01-2006 12:48 PM
Closed venous blood collection device dskee Shop Talk 6 08-02-2006 10:15 AM
Ethics and Legal - Davis v. United States Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 04-16-2005 02:26 PM
Transmission of West Nile Virus through Blood Transfusion in the United States - 2000 Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 09-18-2003 08:05 AM
Detection of West Nile Virus in Blood Donations --- United States, 2003 Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 08-15-2003 07:59 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 PM.






! ! ! NEW ! ! !
NoBlood Mobile
NoBlood Mobile
beta

Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Hospitals
Bloodless Medicine and Surgery Hospitals

Featured
Hospital Sponsors

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.