You are currently accessing this Site as a guest. Please login or register by clicking Here
Click here to see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.
Click here and see who are advancing transfusion alternatives and blood management.

Go Back   NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts


Welcome to NoBlood.

You are currently accessing this Site as a guest which gives you limited access to most discussions and other features. By registering you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, register today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you forgot your password, click here to request a new one.

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2005, 04:46 PM
Nika's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 199
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Nika is on a distinguished road
Phase III clinical trials with darbepoetin: implications for clinicians.

Journal:
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005 Sep;18(3):407-16

Abstract Link:
http://tinyurl.com/3jp7y

Phase III clinical trials with darbepoetin: implications for clinicians.

Glaspy J.


Estelle Sanders Chair in Cancer Research, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Anemia occurring in patients with renal failure on dialysis has been shown to both increase transfusion requirements and decrease functional status and quality of life. As a result, treatment of these patients with an erythropoietic agent such as epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa has become established as an essential part of optimal patient care. Anemia resulting from cancer or chemotherapy is a common problem in oncology, and has been shown similarly to increase transfusion risk and decrease patient reported outcomes. For reasons that are not clear, but may include either frequently encountered slow response or nonresponse and higher doses and hence higher costs, treatment of anemia in oncology has not become a standard treatment for all patients. Erythropoietic agents (epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa) have been used to improve anemia-related fatigue and quality of life in cancer patients. Epoetin is administered 1 to 3 times per week whereas darbepoetin, with up to a 3-fold greater half-life, is given once every 1 or 2 weeks. Recent data demonstrate that darbepoetin can be administered as infrequently as every 3 weeks with comparable erythropoietic efficacy. Several studies have been carried out to determine the optimum schedule of dosing to obtain maximum patient benefit. Following treatment with darbepoetin, antibodies to darbepoetin were not detected, no unusual adverse event was seen with darbepoetin, and the mean increase in hemoglobin remained unchanged when the dosing interval was increased from 1 to 2 weeks. The safety and efficacy of darbepoetin was also determined in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy; the lowest clinically effective dose was determined to be 3.0 and 5.0mug/kg every 2 weeks with a 66 and 84% response, respectively. No additional benefit was seen with higher doses. A multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin administered either weekly, every 3 weeks, or every 4 weeks in anemic patients with cancer who were not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The results indicated that with weekly dosing, 70% of patients showed an increase in hemoglobin. The dose of 4.5mug/kg/week resulted in 100% hematopoietic response. In a randomized, active control, pilot trial, front-loading darbepoetin followed by lower doses or less frequent doses also appears to be efficacious and may decrease the time to response. At the present time, darbepoetin improves anemia, reduces requirements for transfusion, and improves the quality of life for these patients. To compare efficacy of these erythropoietic agents it is important to analyze the data using intent to treat rather than analysis of patients who complete the study. This way a true evaluation of the change of hemoglobin can be assessed corresponding both to dose and an improvement in the QOL.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  NoBlood > Resources > Medical Articles and Abstracts



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Erythropoietin claims monitoring policy: implications for clinical practice. Sharon Grant Tools & Products 0 08-05-2006 08:32 PM
Oxygen carriers coursing through clinical trials Jan B. Wade News and Hot Topics such as Hepatitis C, SARS and AIDS 0 11-14-2005 07:01 PM
Allogeneic transfusion and infection: economic and clinical implications Jan B. Wade Medical Articles and Abstracts 0 03-28-2005 06:38 PM
Sangart Initiates Phase Ib/ii Clinical Trial For Hemospan(tm) Jan B. Wade Press Releases 0 05-08-2003 12:56 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 PM.






Featured
Hospital Sponsors
Hospitals Directory

Click here to help us make a difference today. Yes, for the price of a cup of coffee, you can help NoBlood continue its mission to advance knowledge and awareness of transfusion alternatives, blood conservation, blood management, bloodless medicine and bloodless surgery.
Please help us continue to make a difference today.

Highlights
Looking for help?
Can you help?

Key Wiki Articles
Register - FAQ - Members List - Calendar - Files - Videos - Mark Forums Read - NoBlood.org RSS Feeds

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 1996 - 2008, Bloodless Healthcare International, Inc.