Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Ledford
It apperar that there is an automatic assumption that a blood transfusion would be the life saving treatment needed. It's not. Time and time again, in case after case, it has been proven not to be the only life saving option.
|
Then again, I've also found that there is an automatic assumption among others that a blood transfusion is inherently dangerous, and that transfusion alternatives are the "cure-all", even when there are some things that transfusion alternatives are as of yet incapable of treating. There has been much progress, but no-blood solutions aren't a 100% replacement for transfusions... yet.