If they survive the dangers of these transfusions then they and their family will be consoled as the victims they feel they are. Sadly this is not the first time this sort of thing has happened and therefore there is plenty of evidence to demonstrate that your comment is not the way such ones are treated. Therefore could I ask what you mean by that statement, please?

We look forward to progressive steps away from the sorts of authoritarianism that prefers to use a blanket treatment as they have here in the face of burgeoning information indicating that (1) officialdom neglected due process and (2) the transfusion really wasn't necessary.

I look forward to hearing the complete official story on this case and therefore then exploring the details.